How AI is applied across API Evangelist and APIs.io. Read my AI disclosure →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC
ACI.dev website screenshot

ACI.dev

ACI.dev (Aipolabs Agent-Computer Interface) is an open-source tool-calling platform that hooks AI agents into 600+ pre-built tools through direct function calling or a unified Model Context Protocol server. Maintained by Aipotheosis Labs (Aipolabs) under Apache 2.0, ACI provides multi-tenant OAuth2 and API-key authentication, per-project App Configurations, natural-language permission guardrails, OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible function definitions, Python and TypeScript SDKs, and the unified aci-mcp server with ACI_SEARCH_FUNCTIONS and ACI_EXECUTE_FUNCTION meta-tools. The sister project Gate22 adds an open-source MCP gateway and control plane for governing which tools agents can use, what they can do, and how it is audited.

agent aware

Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.

Kin Score

API Evangelist profiles ACI.dev the way a machine reads it — 45 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.

Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — ACI.dev scores 36.8/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 24/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.

Kin Score

This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.

Kin Score Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-09-10 · rubric v0.20.0
ACI.dev Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist

Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from ACI.dev's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.

<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/aci-dev/"
   title="ACI.dev on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
  <img src="https://apis.io/badge/aci-dev.svg"
       alt="ACI.dev Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>

More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work

How we profile ACI.dev

Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for ACI.dev. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.

APIs 4

Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

ACI.dev app-configurations API

The app-configurations API from ACI.dev — 2 operation(s) for app-configurations.

ACI.dev apps API

The apps API from ACI.dev — 2 operation(s) for apps.

ACI.dev functions API

The functions API from ACI.dev — 3 operation(s) for functions.

ACI.dev linked-accounts API

The linked-accounts API from ACI.dev — 4 operation(s) for linked-accounts.

Open Collections 6

Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.

Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).

Features 13

The notable capabilities this provider advertises, captured as structured features so they can be searched and compared instead of read one landing page at a time.

Notable capabilities this provider offers.

600+ pre-built App integrations (Slack, Gmail, Zendesk, GitHub, Notion, Stripe, and more)
Unified MCP server (aci-mcp) exposing ACI_SEARCH_FUNCTIONS and ACI_EXECUTE_FUNCTION meta-tools
Apps MCP mode that surfaces a specific set of Apps as named MCP tools
Node port (aci-mcp-node) for TypeScript-native MCP integration
OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible function-definition output formats
Multi-tenant end-user OAuth2 link flow, white-label OAuth2 for production branding
Per-project App Configurations with function-level enable/disable and security-scheme overrides
Natural-language permission filters that guardrail tool executions
Custom functions SDK for registering proprietary tools alongside the catalog
Agent Playground for prompting against the unified catalog before wiring it into production
Python and TypeScript SDKs (aci-python-sdk, aci-typescript-sdk)
Sister project gate22 — open-source MCP gateway and control plane for governance and audit across Cursor and other agentic IDEs
Self-hostable backend, frontend portal, and SDKs under Apache 2.0

Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·

Semantic Vocabularies 1

JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.

JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.

Aci Dev Context

0 classes · 5 properties

JSON-LD

Spectral Rules 2

Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.

ACI.dev API Rules

5 rules · 4 warnings

SPECTRAL

ACI.dev API Rules

7 rules · 3 errors · 4 warnings

SPECTRAL

JSON Schema 9

Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.

Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.

AnthropicFunctionDefinition

3 properties

JSON SCHEMA

AppConfigurationPublic

10 properties

JSON SCHEMA

AppBasic

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

AppBasicWithFunctions

3 properties

JSON SCHEMA

FunctionExecute

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

FunctionExecutionResult

3 properties

JSON SCHEMA

FunctionBasic

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

LinkedAccountPublic

8 properties

JSON SCHEMA

OpenAIFunctionDefinition

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Scroll within the panel for all 9 ·

Examples 3

Real request and response payloads are what turn a spec from abstract into obvious — and they're one of the twelve things an agent needs to call an API correctly on the first try.

Example request and response payloads for these APIs.

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Aci Dev Authentication

apiKey · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Aci Dev Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Aci Dev Agentic Access

15 operations · 5 acting

15 operations · 5 acting

AGENTIC

Integrations 4

Pre-built integrations with other platforms tell you where this provider already fits in a stack.

Pre-built integrations with other platforms and tools.

Anthropic Claude (function definitions returned in Anthropic tool-use format)
OpenAI (function definitions returned in OpenAI tool-use format)
Model Context Protocol (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and other MCP clients)
GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Zendesk, Notion, Stripe and 600+ other apps via the ACI catalog

Resources

Every other property we hold for ACI.dev — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.

Get Started 2

Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call

Agent Surfaces 1

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

Design & Contract 3

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

Access & Security 2

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Commercial 1

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

Company 3

The organization behind the API

← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/aci-dev · machine-readable index on apis.io

Where this information came from

This is an independent, third-party profile of ACI.dev, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.

The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.

Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.

info@apievangelist.com · Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.