Bestmile
Bestmile was a Swiss fleet-orchestration SaaS company, spun out of EPFL in Lausanne in 2014, whose cloud platform planned, dispatched and optimized mixed fleets of autonomous and human-driven vehicles for on-demand mobility and transit operators. The platform was described by the company as API-first, with documented Fleet, Booking and Transportation APIs for integrating operator booking apps, fleet-management systems and traveler-information systems. The company no longer operates: ZF Friedrichshafen acquired Bestmile's technology in November 2021 and folded it into its own SCALAR fleet-orchestration platform, so any successor API belongs to ZF rather than to Bestmile. As of 2026-08-17 bestmile.com is a parked Gandi.net registrar domain that refuses HTTPS, and no developer portal, documentation, OpenAPI, package or /.well-known surface survives. Surfaced originally as a Partech portfolio company.
Index entry only — little beyond a description and a link, and nothing machine-readable enough for an agent to act on without a human reading the site first.
API Evangelist profiles Bestmile the way a machine reads it — 1 machine-readable artifact, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Bestmile scores 5.3/100 (minimal), with a separate agent-readiness read of 0/100 (human only). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Why this profile is thin
bestmile.com refuses HTTPS entirely and its HTTP/80 root serves a Gandi.net registrar parking page; api., docs., developer., platform. and app.bestmile.com are NXDOMAIN, and the surviving github.com/Bestmile org holds only forks of third-party OSS (secor, alpakka, chimney, squants) with no spec or SDK, because ZF Friedrichshafen absorbed the technology into SCALAR in November 2021.
This is an honest zero, not a gap in our research. Bestmile does not appear to expose an API, so there is nothing here for us to index and nothing for them to fix.
What we probed
https://bestmile.com/→ HTTP 0http://bestmile.com/→ HTTP 200http://bestmile.com/.well-known/agent-card.json→ HTTP 200https://api.github.com/orgs/bestmile→ HTTP 200https://pypi.org/pypi/bestmile/json→ HTTP 404
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from Bestmile's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/bestmile/"
title="Bestmile on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/bestmile.svg"
alt="Bestmile Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>
[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/bestmile/)
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/bestmile/"
title="Bestmile on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/bestmile/card.svg"
alt="Bestmile Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>
More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile Bestmile
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Bestmile. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
Security Posture 1
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Bestmile — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Build 1
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 1
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Company 1
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/bestmile · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of Bestmile, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.