Codecov
Codecov provides a code coverage testing and insights platform that helps development teams improve code quality. It offers AI‑generated unit tests, pull‑request reviews, and detailed coverage analytics across multiple languages and CI systems. The service includes integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Sentry, and many other tools, plus enterprise features like custom dashboards, security scanning, and support options. Codecov aims to make testing faster and more reliable, enabling faster releases and higher software quality.
Solid contracts, transparent operations, and an easy start — typically complete on four or five facets with one clear soft spot.
API Evangelist profiles Codecov the way a machine reads it — 51 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Codecov scores 59.2/100 (strong), with a separate agent-readiness read of 24/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Why this profile is thin
No OpenAPI or other machine‑readable contract was found on the documented docs host.
The documentation is public — a person can read it, but a machine cannot. This one is Codecov's to change: publishing an OpenAPI (or AsyncAPI for events) at a stable URL would make the same surface consumable by a crawler, a linter, and an AI agent.
What we probed
https://docs.codecov.com/openapi.json→ HTTP 404https://docs.codecov.com/openapi.yaml→ HTTP 429
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-10-31 · rubric v0.25.0
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from Codecov's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/codecov/"
title="Codecov on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/codecov.svg"
alt="Codecov Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/codecov/)<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/codecov/"
title="Codecov on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/codecov/card.svg"
alt="Codecov Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile Codecov
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Codecov. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 13
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Codecov API
Codecov API documentation and reference
Codecov Branches API
The Branches API from Codecov — 2 operation(s) for branches.
Codecov Commits API
The Commits API from Codecov — 3 operation(s) for commits.
Codecov Comparison API
The Comparison API from Codecov — 6 operation(s) for comparison.
Codecov Components API
The Components API from Codecov — 1 operation(s) for components.
Codecov Coverage API
The Coverage API from Codecov — 5 operation(s) for coverage.
Codecov Evaluations API
The Evaluations API from Codecov — 2 operation(s) for evaluations.
Codecov Flags API
The Flags API from Codecov — 2 operation(s) for flags.
Codecov Pulls API
The Pulls API from Codecov — 2 operation(s) for pulls.
Codecov Repos API
The Repos API from Codecov — 3 operation(s) for repos.
Codecov Test Analytics API
The Test Analytics API from Codecov — 1 operation(s) for test analytics.
Codecov Test Results API
The Test Results API from Codecov — 2 operation(s) for test results.
Codecov Users API
The Users API from Codecov — 5 operation(s) for users.
Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·
Pricing Plans 1
Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the things the Kin Score reads for access clarity — renamed from commercial clarity in rubric 0.12, because a free statutory interface has access terms and no commercial ones.
Published pricing tiers and plan structures.
Semantic Vocabularies 1
JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.
JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.
Codecov Context
JSON-LDSpectral Rules 1
Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.
Codecov API Rules
SPECTRALJSON Schema 30
Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.
Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.
BranchDetail
JSON SCHEMACommitDetail
JSON SCHEMAComparison
JSON SCHEMAComponentComparison
JSON SCHEMAComponent
JSON SCHEMACoverageReport
JSON SCHEMAFileComparison
JSON SCHEMAFileReport
JSON SCHEMAFlagComparison
JSON SCHEMAImpactedFileSegments
JSON SCHEMAImpactedFilesComparison
JSON SCHEMAOwner
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedBranchList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedCommitList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedCommitUploadsList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedFlagList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedMeasurementList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedOwnerList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedPullList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedRepoList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedTestrunList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedUserList
JSON SCHEMAPaginatedUserSessionList
JSON SCHEMAPatchedUserUpdateActivation
JSON SCHEMAPull
JSON SCHEMARepoConfig
JSON SCHEMARepo
JSON SCHEMATestrun
JSON SCHEMATree
JSON SCHEMAUser
JSON SCHEMAScroll within the panel for all 30 ·
Security Posture 4
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Codecov — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 3
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 2
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 3
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 6
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Build 4
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 11
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Scroll within the panel for all 11 ·
Operate 3
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 3
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 3
The organization behind the API
Other 3
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/codecov · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of Codecov, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.