Context.ai *
Context (context.ai) is a unified enterprise AI platform for building, deploying, and improving AI agents at scale. The product is organized into modular components: a Workspace for authoring agent workflows in plain English, an Engine with 800+ connectors and IdP-brokered identity, Unify as a knowledge/institutional-context repository, and Evals for rubric-based quality scoring. It is model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, or open weights) and offers hosted, VPC, on-prem, or air-gapped deployment. The company originated as a GV (Google Ventures) and Theory Ventures backed product-analytics-for-LLMs startup and now operates as an enterprise agent platform used by teams including Qualcomm, Stripe, and Palantir. This repo carries no public developer/API surface: the provider publishes no OpenAPI, SDKs, MCP server, or developer documentation, so most machine-readable artifacts are not applicable.
Index entry only — little beyond a description and a link, and nothing machine-readable enough for an agent to act on without a human reading the site first.
API Evangelist profiles Context.ai * the way a machine reads it — 1 machine-readable artifact, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Context.ai * scores 14.9/100 (minimal), with a separate agent-readiness read of 0/100 (human only). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile Context.ai *
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Context.ai *. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
Security Posture 1
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Context.ai * — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 1
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Agent Surfaces 1
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Access & Security 1
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 1
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 2
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/contextai · machine-readable index on apis.io