How AI is applied across API Evangelist and APIs.io. Read my AI disclosure →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC
CyberArk website screenshot

CyberArk

CyberArk is the global leader in identity security, providing a unified Identity Security Platform that protects human, machine, and application identities across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Core product lines include Privileged Access Manager (PAM Self-Hosted) and Privilege Cloud for credential vaulting and session management; Conjur Secrets Manager (Open Source, Enterprise, and Cloud) for machine-identity and DevOps secrets; CyberArk Identity for workforce SSO, MFA, and lifecycle; Endpoint Privilege Manager for least-privilege enforcement on Windows / macOS / Linux endpoints; Secure Cloud Access for just-in-time cloud entitlements; and Customer Identity for B2B / B2C identity. CyberArk publishes a canonical OpenAPI 3.1 specification for Conjur Secrets Manager at github.com/cyberark/conjur-openapi-spec, and REST APIs for PAM Self-Hosted, Privilege Cloud, and CyberArk Identity are documented on docs.cyberark.com and developer.cyberark.com.

agent aware

Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.

Kin Score

API Evangelist profiles CyberArk the way a machine reads it — 31 machine-readable artifacts across 10 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.

Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — CyberArk scores 44.6/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 31/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.

Kin Score

This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.

Kin Score Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-08-17 · rubric v0.11.0
Composite quality — 44.6/100 · developing
Contract Quality 15.3 / 25
Developer Ergonomics 5.7 / 20
Commercial Clarity 8.9 / 20
Operational Transparency 3.8 / 13
Governance 3.8 / 12
Discoverability 7.2 / 10
Agent readiness — 31/100 · agent aware
Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18
Agentic Access Contract derived 2.5 / 10
MCP Server 0 / 12
Machine-Readable Auth 10 / 10
Idempotency 0 / 9
Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8
Request/Response Examples 0 / 7
Rate-Limit Signaling documented 3.5 / 7
Typed Event Surface 0 / 6
Agent Skills 0 / 5
Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4
Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3
A2A Agent Card 0 / 8
Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4
CyberArk Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist

Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from CyberArk's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.

<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/cyberark/"
   title="CyberArk on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
  <img src="https://apis.io/badge/cyberark.svg"
       alt="CyberArk Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>

More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work

How we profile CyberArk

Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for CyberArk. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.

APIs 10

Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

CyberArk PAM Self-Hosted REST API

The Privileged Access Manager Self-Hosted REST API exposes the Vault for managing accounts, safes, platforms, users, sessions, and applications. Authentication uses the Logon en...

CyberArk Privilege Cloud REST API

The Privilege Cloud Shared Services REST API mirrors the PAM Self-Hosted surface for accounts, safes, platforms, and users while running as a SaaS on the CyberArk Identity Secur...

CyberArk Identity REST API

The CyberArk Identity REST API enables programmatic management of users, roles, applications, MFA policies, SSO, and SCIM-based provisioning across the workforce identity tenant...

CyberArk Authentication API

Authenticate hosts and users, exchange credentials for access tokens.

CyberArk Health API

Health and information endpoints.

CyberArk Policies API

Load, update, and replace Conjur policy YAML.

CyberArk PublicKeys API

Retrieve public keys associated with users and hosts.

CyberArk Resources API

Inspect resources (hosts, users, groups, layers, variables) and check permissions.

CyberArk Roles API

Manage role membership and inspect role information.

CyberArk Secrets API

Store and retrieve secret values bound to variable resources.

Scroll within the panel for all 10 ·

Open Collections 9

Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.

Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).

Scroll within the panel for all 9 ·

Pricing Plans 1

Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the six things the Kin Score reads for commercial clarity.

Published pricing tiers and plan structures.

Rate Limits 1

Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.

Documented rate limits and quota policies.

Cyberark Rate Limits

4 limits

RATE LIMITS

FinOps 1

Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.

Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.

Semantic Vocabularies 1

JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.

JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.

Cyberark Context

29 classes · 0 properties

JSON-LD

Spectral Rules 2

Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.

CyberArk API Rules

6 rules · 2 errors · 4 warnings

SPECTRAL

CyberArk API Rules

5 rules · 3 warnings

SPECTRAL

JSON Schema 2

Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.

Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.

ConjurResource

5 properties

JSON SCHEMA

PrivilegedAccount

9 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Security Posture 3

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Cyberark Authentication

http · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Cyberark Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DNSSEC · DMARC

SECURITY

Cyberark Trust Center

SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR, CSA STAR

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Cyberark Agentic Access

13 operations · 5 acting

13 operations · 5 acting

AGENTIC

Resources

Every other property we hold for CyberArk — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.

Get Started 1

Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call

Agent Surfaces 2

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

Design & Contract 3

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

Build 2

SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with

Access & Security 4

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Operate 2

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Commercial 2

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

Company 2

The organization behind the API

Other 2

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/cyberark · machine-readable index on apis.io

Where this information came from

This is an independent, third-party profile of CyberArk, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.

The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.

Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.

info@apievangelist.com · Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.