Harver
Harver is a Talent Intelligence platform for pre-employment assessment, automated interview scheduling and reference checking that helps organizations make data-driven, less-biased hiring decisions at scale. Harver's Public API (OpenAPI 3.0, v1.37.0) is available to Harver customers and lets ATS and HR systems submit candidates, create applications and magic-links, retrieve matching scores, module results and report links, manage vacancies, locations, regions and job functions, and subscribe to candidate-lifecycle webhooks. Authentication is OAuth2 client_credentials; resources use a JSON:API-style envelope, responses are rate-limited (Ratelimit-Limit/Reset, 429) and carry an X-Correlation-Id. Harver was surfaced as an Insight Partners portfolio company.
Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.
API Evangelist profiles Harver the way a machine reads it — 24 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Harver scores 40.6/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 30/100 (agent ready). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-09-08 · rubric v0.20.0
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from Harver's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/harver/"
title="Harver on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/harver.svg"
alt="Harver Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/harver/)<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/harver/"
title="Harver on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/harver/card.svg"
alt="Harver Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile Harver
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Harver. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 9
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Harver accounts API
The accounts API from Harver — 16 operation(s) for accounts.
Harver applications API
The applications API from Harver — 12 operation(s) for applications.
Harver candidate-statuses API
The candidate-statuses API from Harver — 1 operation(s) for candidate-statuses.
Harver candidateApplications API
The candidateApplications API from Harver — 1 operation(s) for candidateapplications.
Harver oauth API
The oauth API from Harver — 3 operation(s) for oauth.
Harver scheduling API
The scheduling API from Harver — 2 operation(s) for scheduling.
Harver user-profile API
The user-profile API from Harver — 3 operation(s) for user-profile.
Harver vacancies API
The vacancies API from Harver — 6 operation(s) for vacancies.
Harver webhook API
The webhook API from Harver — 1 operation(s) for webhook.
Scroll within the panel for all 9 ·
Open Collections 10
Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.
Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).
API Collection
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts applications API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts candidate-statuses API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts candidateApplications API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts oauth API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts scheduling API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts user-profile API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts vacancies API
OPEN COLLECTIONHarver Public accounts webhook API
OPEN COLLECTIONScroll within the panel for all 10 ·
Event Specifications 1
Not every API is request/response. AsyncAPI describes the event-driven and streaming side — the webhooks and channels — so the asynchronous half of the interface is documented the same way the synchronous half is.
AsyncAPI definitions for this provider's event-driven and streaming APIs.
Harver Webhooks
ASYNCAPISecurity Posture 3
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Harver — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 1
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 2
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 5
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 6
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Build 1
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 6
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 1
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 1
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
Other 1
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/harver · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of Harver, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.