Leaders In Tech
Leaders In Tech (LIT) is a leadership accelerator for startup founders and technology executives, founded in 2015 and part of the Y Combinator Summer 2015 batch. Based in San Francisco, it runs cohort-based fellowship programs grounded in experiential, feedback-rich learning: the Founder Fellows Program (10 months, Series A to pre-IPO), the Grove Fellows Program (6 months, pre-seed and seed founders), the Executive Fellows Program (6 months, senior leaders), plus corporate workshops and retreats. Its primary teaching methodology is T-groups — small-group experiential learning built on shared observation, collective accountability and repeated practice — a model brought from the Stanford Graduate School of Business by co-founder Dr. Carole Robin. Leaders In Tech reports more than 350 alumni founders running companies valued at over $75B. It is a leadership-development organization, not a software or API provider: it publishes no public API, developer portal, SDK or machine-readable interface.
Index entry only — little beyond a description and a link, and nothing machine-readable enough for an agent to act on without a human reading the site first.
API Evangelist profiles Leaders In Tech the way a machine reads it — 1 machine-readable artifact, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Leaders In Tech scores 6.8/100 (minimal), with a separate agent-readiness read of 0/100 (human only). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile Leaders In Tech
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Leaders In Tech. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
Security Posture 1
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Leaders In Tech — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Agent Surfaces 1
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Access & Security 1
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 2
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Company 3
The organization behind the API
Other 2
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/leaders-in-tech · machine-readable index on apis.io