Rhythms
Rhythms is an AI operating partner for teams, built by the team behind Ally.io and Microsoft Viva Goals. It automates business reviews, pre-briefs, reports, and OKR/goal tracking, surfaces execution risks early, and keeps organizational alignment visible across hundreds of connected business tools. Rhythms exposes a multi-tenant REST API (api.rhythms.ai) covering documents, teams, users, labels, OKR objectives and time periods, data sources, connector and access requests, and explorer views, with page-based pagination and a Ransack-based filtering DSL. It also supports custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations so agents can connect to the platform. Backed by Accel.
Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.
API Evangelist profiles Rhythms the way a machine reads it — 18 machine-readable artifacts across 13 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Rhythms scores 40.4/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 58/100 (agent ready). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile Rhythms
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Rhythms. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 13
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Rhythms access_requests API
The access_requests API from Rhythms — 3 operation(s) for access_requests.
Rhythms chat_refresh_threads API
The chat_refresh_threads API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for chat_refresh_threads.
Rhythms connector_requests API
The connector_requests API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for connector_requests.
Rhythms data_sources API
The data_sources API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for data_sources.
Rhythms documents API
The documents API from Rhythms — 4 operation(s) for documents.
Rhythms explorer_views API
The explorer_views API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for explorer_views.
Rhythms labels API
The labels API from Rhythms — 2 operation(s) for labels.
Rhythms mention_access_checks API
The mention_access_checks API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for mention_access_checks.
Rhythms notifications API
The notifications API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for notifications.
Rhythms objectives API
The objectives API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for objectives.
Rhythms teams API
The teams API from Rhythms — 6 operation(s) for teams.
Rhythms time_periods API
The time_periods API from Rhythms — 2 operation(s) for time_periods.
Rhythms users API
The users API from Rhythms — 1 operation(s) for users.
Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·
MCP Servers 1
Model Context Protocol servers expose these APIs directly to AI agents. We profile them because agent-native access is the fastest-growing way this provider's capabilities actually get used.
Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.
rhythms-mcp.yml
MCP SERVERSecurity Posture 3
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Rhythms — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 2
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Agent Surfaces 4
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 3
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Access & Security 3
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 2
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 3
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/rhythms · machine-readable index on apis.io