SwiftConnect
SwiftConnect operates a "connected access network" that unifies digital identity, physical access credentials and building infrastructure into one platform, so an employee badge can live in Apple, Google or Samsung Wallet and open the doors an employer has authorized. Founded in 2020 and headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, the company sits between access-control systems (LenelS2, Software House C-CURE 9000, Genetec), credential providers (HID, LEGIC, Wavelynx), identity providers and workplace platforms, and automates credential issuance, permission changes and revocation across all of them. It exposes that capability programmatically through the SwiftConnect Developer API at https://api.swiftconnect.io — a JSON REST API using bearer JWT authentication and a versioned `application/vnd.swiftconnect.v2+json` media type — plus a mobile "universal provisioning SDK" for adding credentials to a device wallet. The API reference is published on a password-protected ReadMe hub, so no machine-readable contract is public.
More than an index entry, but the surface is still mostly links rather than artifacts — the cohort most likely to move a full band from modest, well-targeted work.
API Evangelist profiles SwiftConnect the way a machine reads it — 5 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — SwiftConnect scores 21.4/100 (emerging), with a separate agent-readiness read of 8/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Why this profile is thin
SwiftConnect's API reference is a ReadMe hub at swiftconnect.readme.io that is site-wide password-protected — every path returns the same shell whose canonical link is /password and whose meta description reads "This page is password-protected" — so the contract is unreadable even though the API itself is live and answers on api.swiftconnect.io.
An API exists — we simply could not reach the contract without credentials or a sales conversation. This one is SwiftConnect's to change: publishing the reference and a machine-readable spec at a public URL, while keeping key issuance behind whatever gate they like, would let an integrator evaluate the API before committing to a call.
What we probed
https://swiftconnect.readme.io/→ HTTP 200https://api.swiftconnect.io/credentials→ HTTP 401https://api.swiftconnect.io/openapi.json→ HTTP 404https://www.swiftconnect.com/developer-api/→ HTTP 404
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-09-01 · rubric v0.18.0
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from SwiftConnect's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/swiftconnect/"
title="SwiftConnect on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/swiftconnect.svg"
alt="SwiftConnect Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/swiftconnect/)<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/swiftconnect/"
title="SwiftConnect on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/swiftconnect/card.svg"
alt="SwiftConnect Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile SwiftConnect
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for SwiftConnect. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 1
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
SwiftConnect Developer API
The SwiftConnect Developer API provides programmatic access to access credentials, permissions, people, buildings, readers and devices across the connected access network, so pr...
Pricing Plans 1
Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the things the Kin Score reads for access clarity — renamed from commercial clarity in rubric 0.12, because a free statutory interface has access terms and no commercial ones.
Published pricing tiers and plan structures.
Rate Limits 1
Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.
Documented rate limits and quota policies.
Swiftconnect Rate Limits
RATE LIMITSSecurity Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for SwiftConnect — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 1
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 1
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 1
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 4
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Build 1
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 2
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 3
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 3
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 3
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/swiftconnect · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of SwiftConnect, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.