ThreatConnect
ThreatConnect is a cybersecurity platform that provides threat intelligence, analytics, and response orchestration for security operations teams. It enables organizations to aggregate, analyze, and act on threat data from multiple sources, automating workflows and facilitating collaboration across the security lifecycle. The company offers a suite of tools for threat detection, investigation, and mitigation, integrating with existing security technologies to enhance overall cyber resilience.
Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.
API Evangelist profiles ThreatConnect the way a machine reads it — 25 machine-readable artifacts across 15 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — ThreatConnect scores 26.2/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 18/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Why this profile is thin
Documentation pages exist but no machine‑readable OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC or WSDL contracts were found.
The documentation is public — a person can read it, but a machine cannot. This one is ThreatConnect's to change: publishing an OpenAPI (or AsyncAPI for events) at a stable URL would make the same surface consumable by a crawler, a linter, and an AI agent.
What we probed
https://docs.threatconnect.com/en/latest/rest_api/overview.html→ HTTP 200
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-10-17 · rubric v0.24.0
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from ThreatConnect's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/threatconnect/"
title="ThreatConnect on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/threatconnect.svg"
alt="ThreatConnect Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/threatconnect/)<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/threatconnect/"
title="ThreatConnect on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/threatconnect/card.svg"
alt="ThreatConnect Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile ThreatConnect
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for ThreatConnect. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 15
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
ThreatConnect Apps API
The Apps API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for apps.
ThreatConnect Batch API
The Batch API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for batch.
ThreatConnect Cases API
The Cases API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for cases.
ThreatConnect Custommetrics API
The Custommetrics API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for custommetrics.
ThreatConnect Groups API
The Groups API from ThreatConnect — 9 operation(s) for groups.
ThreatConnect Indicators API
The Indicators API from ThreatConnect — 12 operation(s) for indicators.
ThreatConnect Notes API
The Notes API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for notes.
ThreatConnect Notifications API
The Notifications API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for notifications.
ThreatConnect Services API
The Services API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for services.
ThreatConnect Tasks API
The Tasks API from ThreatConnect — 3 operation(s) for tasks.
ThreatConnect Tc Taxii API
The Tc Taxii API from ThreatConnect — 2 operation(s) for tc taxii.
ThreatConnect ThreatConnect API
The ThreatConnect API API from ThreatConnect — 3 operation(s) for threatconnect api.
ThreatConnect Token API
The Token API from ThreatConnect — 1 operation(s) for token.
ThreatConnect Types API
The Types API from ThreatConnect — 2 operation(s) for types.
ThreatConnect Victims API
The Victims API from ThreatConnect — 2 operation(s) for victims.
Scroll within the panel for all 15 ·
Semantic Vocabularies 1
JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.
JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.
Threatconnect Context
JSON-LDSpectral Rules 1
Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.
ThreatConnect API Rules
SPECTRALJSON Schema 6
Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.
Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.
PostV2CustommetricsTaskscompletedDataRequest
JSON SCHEMAPostV2NotificationsRequest
JSON SCHEMAPostV3GroupsResponse
JSON SCHEMAPutV3IndicatorsUltrabadguyComRequest
JSON SCHEMASecurity Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for ThreatConnect — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 1
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 1
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Design & Contract 6
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Build 2
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 2
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 1
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Other 2
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/threatconnect · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of ThreatConnect, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.