US Commission on Civil Rights
The US Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan federal agency that investigates, reports on, and issues public service announcements about discrimination or denials of equal protection based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or in the electoral process. The Commission informs the development of national civil rights policy and laws through factual research, advisory committees in all 50 states, and public reporting to the President and Congress.
Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.
API Evangelist profiles US Commission on Civil Rights the way a machine reads it — 26 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — US Commission on Civil Rights scores 41.5/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 7/100 (human only). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile US Commission on Civil Rights
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for US Commission on Civil Rights. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 1
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
US Commission on Civil Rights
The US Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan federal agency established in 1957 that investigates, reports on, and issues public service announcements about d...
Pricing Plans 1
Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the six things the Kin Score reads for commercial clarity.
Published pricing tiers and plan structures.
Rate Limits 1
Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.
Documented rate limits and quota policies.
Us Commission On Civil Rights Rate Limits
RATE LIMITSFinOps 1
Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.
Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.
Features 5
The notable capabilities this provider advertises, captured as structured features so they can be searched and compared instead of read one landing page at a time.
Notable capabilities this provider offers.
Civil Rights Complaints Data
Interactive map and datasets of civil rights complaints filed with federal agencies, organized by state and subject matter.
Data Inventory Program
Annual comprehensive data inventory maintained per the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018, with a designated Chief Data Officer.
No FEAR Act Statistics
Federal employee discrimination complaint statistics required under the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act.
Advisory Committee Reports
Reports from 51 state and local advisory committees covering civil rights conditions across all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Statutory Enforcement Reports
Congressional and Presidential reports on federal agency civil rights enforcement activities and compliance.
Semantic Vocabularies 1
JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.
JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.
Spectral Rules 1
Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.
JSON Schema 3
Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.
Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.
JSON Structure 3
JSON Structure captures the data shapes in a form built for tooling — a complement to JSON Schema that keeps the model machine-legible.
JSON Structure definitions describing this provider's data shapes.
Us Commission On Civil Rights Complaint Structure
JSON STRUCTUREUs Commission On Civil Rights No Fear Act Structure
JSON STRUCTUREUs Commission On Civil Rights Report Structure
JSON STRUCTUREExamples 3
Real request and response payloads are what turn a spec from abstract into obvious — and they're one of the twelve things an agent needs to call an API correctly on the first try.
Example request and response payloads for these APIs.
Security Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Use Cases 4
What developers actually build with this provider — captured so the catalogue answers 'what is this for', not just 'what does this expose'.
What developers build with this provider.
Civil Rights Policy Research
Accessing Commission reports, briefing papers, and findings to inform civil rights policy development and legislative analysis.
Discrimination Complaint Analysis
Analyzing civil rights complaint data by state, subject, and federal agency to understand discrimination patterns and trends.
Federal Agency Compliance Monitoring
Reviewing No FEAR Act statistics and statutory enforcement data to assess federal agency compliance with civil rights laws.
Academic Research
Using Commission datasets and reports for academic research on civil rights, equal opportunity, and discrimination in the United States.
Resources
Every other property we hold for US Commission on Civil Rights — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Documentation 1
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Design & Contract 2
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Access & Security 2
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 2
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 1
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/us-commission-on-civil-rights · machine-readable index on apis.io