Need help with your APIs? I offer API discovery, governance & evangelism services. Explore services →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC

Whitespace

Whitespace Software Limited is a London-based digital placing platform for the Lloyd's and London (re)insurance market, and one of only two electronic placing systems given fully recognised status by Lloyd's. Acquired by Verisk (via Sequel), Whitespace lets brokers and underwriters create, negotiate, quote, firm-order, line, sign and endorse fully digital subscription-market contracts in place of the traditional slip, across property and casualty, specialty, marine, aviation, energy and reinsurance business written in the United Kingdom and internationally. Its API posture is unusually strong for the insurance sector but only half open: the reference documentation is genuinely public and unauthenticated at apidocs.whitespace.co.uk, with a complete OpenAPI 3.0.0 description of 113 endpoints served through Swagger UI at swagger.whitespace.co.uk, yet there is no self-serve signup. Sandbox and production service tokens are issued by Whitespace Support to contracted broker, carrier and vendor organisations, are IP-allowlisted and expire within a year, so the integration surface itself is partner-gated. Whitespace is ACORD-native rather than merely ACORD-aware: it authored the JSON Market Reform Contract (JMRC) standard and donated it to ACORD for incorporation into the Global Reinsurance and Large Commercial data standards, and its Defined Data API returns contract values tagged with an ACORDGPM tagset alongside MRC headings. Event integration is delivered as per-client Azure Service Bus queues rather than webhooks, and no AsyncAPI, GraphQL or public Postman workspace is published.

agent native

Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.

Kin Score

API Evangelist profiles Whitespace the way a machine reads it — 6 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.

Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Whitespace scores 51.5/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 71/100 (agent native). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.

Kin Score

This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.

Kin Score Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
Composite quality — 51.5/100 · developing
Contract Quality 15.1 / 25
Developer Ergonomics 16.1 / 20
Commercial Clarity 6.8 / 20
Operational Transparency 3.8 / 13
Governance 0.0 / 12
Discoverability 9.3 / 10
Regulatory · Securities & Market Data 8.1 / 15
Agent readiness — 71/100 · agent native
Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18
Agentic Access Contract 15 / 15
MCP Server 12 / 12
Machine-Readable Auth 10 / 10
Idempotency 0 / 9
Stable Error Semantics 8 / 8
Request/Response Examples 0 / 7
Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7
Typed Event Surface 6 / 6
Agent Skills 5 / 5
Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4
Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

How we profile Whitespace

Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Whitespace. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.

APIs 1

Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

Whitespace Platform API

The Whitespace Platform API is a REST/JSON API over the full London-market subscription placing lifecycle, publicly described by an OpenAPI 3.0.0 document covering 113 endpoints...

MCP Servers 1

Model Context Protocol servers expose these APIs directly to AI agents. We profile them because agent-native access is the fastest-growing way this provider's capabilities actually get used.

Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.

Event Specifications 1

Not every API is request/response. AsyncAPI describes the event-driven and streaming side — the webhooks and channels — so the asynchronous half of the interface is documented the same way the synchronous half is.

AsyncAPI definitions for this provider's event-driven and streaming APIs.

Whitespace Platform Activity Queues

An AsyncAPI description of the Whitespace Platform event surface, generated by API Evangelist from Whitespace's own published queue guides. Whitespace does NOT publish an AsyncA...

ASYNCAPI

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Whitespace London Authentication

http · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Whitespace London Domain Security

TLSv1.2 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Whitespace London Agentic Access

121 operations · 73 acting

121 operations · 73 acting

AGENTIC

Resources

Every other property we hold for Whitespace — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.

Documentation 3

Reference material describing how the API behaves

Agent Surfaces 4

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

Access & Security 2

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Commercial 2

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

Other 2

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/whitespace-london · machine-readable index on apis.io