World Health Organization (WHO)
The World Health Organization (WHO) is the United Nations specialized agency for international public health. WHO provides free public REST APIs giving programmatic access to global health statistics, disease surveillance data, immunization coverage, health indicators by country, and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The GHO OData API exposes hundreds of health indicators across all WHO member states with no authentication required, while the ICD API provides structured access to ICD-11 and ICD-10 clinical classifications via OAuth 2 credentials obtained through free registration.
Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.
API Evangelist profiles World Health Organization (WHO) the way a machine reads it — 37 machine-readable artifacts across 3 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — World Health Organization (WHO) scores 46.9/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 48/100 (agent ready). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
How we profile World Health Organization (WHO)
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for World Health Organization (WHO). For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 3
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
World Health Organization (WHO) Foundation API
The Foundation API from World Health Organization (WHO) — 4 operation(s) for foundation.
World Health Organization (WHO) ICD10 API
The ICD10 API from World Health Organization (WHO) — 4 operation(s) for icd10.
World Health Organization (WHO) Linearization (classification endpoints) API
The Linearization (classification endpoints) API from World Health Organization (WHO) — 13 operation(s) for linearization (classification endpoints).
Pricing Plans 1
Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the six things the Kin Score reads for commercial clarity.
Published pricing tiers and plan structures.
Who Plans Pricing
PLANSRate Limits 1
Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.
Documented rate limits and quota policies.
Who Rate Limits
RATE LIMITSFinOps 1
Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.
Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.
Who Finops
FINOPSSemantic Vocabularies 1
JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.
JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.
Who Context
JSON-LDSpectral Rules 1
Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.
JSON Schema 25
Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.
Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.
AutoCodingSearchResult
JSON SCHEMACodeInfo
JSON SCHEMADeathCertificateCheckResult
JSON SCHEMAEntityTypeEnum
JSON SCHEMAFoundationEntity
JSON SCHEMAGuessTypeEnum
JSON SCHEMAGuessWord
JSON SCHEMAICD10Entity
JSON SCHEMAISearchResult
JSON SCHEMAISimpleEntity
JSON SCHEMAISimplePropertyValue
JSON SCHEMALanguageSpecificText
JSON SCHEMALinearizationEntity
JSON SCHEMAMatchLevelEnum
JSON SCHEMAMultiVersion
JSON SCHEMAPostcoordinationAvailabilityEnum
JSON SCHEMAPostcoordinationScaleInfo
JSON SCHEMAPostcoordinationSet
JSON SCHEMAPostcoordinationValue
JSON SCHEMAPropertyValueTypeEnum
JSON SCHEMATerm
JSON SCHEMATopLevel
JSON SCHEMATopLevelFoundation
JSON SCHEMATopLevelLinearization
JSON SCHEMAUnderlyingCauseOfDeath
JSON SCHEMAScroll within the panel for all 25 ·
Security Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Scopes 1
OAuth scopes are the vocabulary of least-privilege access. Profiling them shows exactly what an integration — or an agent acting on a user's behalf — is allowed to do.
OAuth scopes governing access to this provider's APIs.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for World Health Organization (WHO) — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Documentation 1
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 1
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Build 1
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 3
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 1
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 3
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 3
The organization behind the API
Other 1
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/who · machine-readable index on apis.io