Accept
Accept Labs is the company behind MIDAS, an open-source authority-governance engine for autonomous decisions. MIDAS evaluates every agent or AI-system action against explicit authority, operational boundaries, and execution context before the action occurs, then produces exactly one outcome (accept, escalate, reject, or request_clarification) and one tamper-evident audit envelope. The platform is Apache-2.0 Go software with a runtime evaluation API (POST /v1/evaluate), a YAML control-plane for surfaces/profiles/grants, an evidence and integrity API, drift detection, an Explorer UI, and OIDC/local IAM. It is positioned for enterprise teams governing what automated actors are authorised to decide.
Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.
API Evangelist profiles Accept the way a machine reads it — 51 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Accept scores 41.1/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 34/100 (agent ready). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-09-10 · rubric v0.20.0
Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from Accept's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.
<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/accept/"
title="Accept on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/accept.svg"
alt="Accept Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>[](https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/accept/)<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/accept/"
title="Accept on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
<img src="https://apis.io/badge/accept/card.svg"
alt="Accept Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="340" height="120" loading="lazy">
</a>More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work
How we profile Accept
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Accept. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 23
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Accept Agents API
The Agents API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for agents.
Accept Aisystems API
The Aisystems API from Accept — 5 operation(s) for aisystems.
Accept Businessservices API
The Businessservices API from Accept — 3 operation(s) for businessservices.
Accept Capabilities API
The Capabilities API from Accept — 5 operation(s) for capabilities.
Accept Controlplane API
The Controlplane API from Accept — 18 operation(s) for controlplane.
Accept Coverage API
The Coverage API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for coverage.
Accept Decisions API
The Decisions API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for decisions.
Accept Drift API
The Drift API from Accept — 15 operation(s) for drift.
Accept Envelopes API
The Envelopes API from Accept — 2 operation(s) for envelopes.
Accept Escalation Targets API
The Escalation Targets API from Accept — 4 operation(s) for escalation targets.
Accept Escalations API
The Escalations API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for escalations.
Accept Evaluate API
The Evaluate API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for evaluate.
Accept Evidence API
The Evidence API from Accept — 4 operation(s) for evidence.
Accept Fail Mode Policies API
The Fail Mode Policies API from Accept — 3 operation(s) for fail mode policies.
Accept Grants API
The Grants API from Accept — 2 operation(s) for grants.
Accept Graphs API
The Graphs API from Accept — 2 operation(s) for graphs.
Accept Healthz API
The Healthz API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for healthz.
Accept Platform API
The Platform API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for platform.
Accept Processes API
The Processes API from Accept — 3 operation(s) for processes.
Accept Profiles API
The Profiles API from Accept — 4 operation(s) for profiles.
Accept Readyz API
The Readyz API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for readyz.
Accept Reviews API
The Reviews API from Accept — 1 operation(s) for reviews.
Accept Surfaces API
The Surfaces API from Accept — 4 operation(s) for surfaces.
Scroll within the panel for all 23 ·
Open Collections 23
Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.
Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).
API Collection
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Aisystems API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Businessservices API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Capabilities API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Controlplane API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Coverage API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Decisions API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Drift API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Envelopes API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Escalation Targets API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Escalations API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Evaluate API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Evidence API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Fail Mode Policies API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Grants API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Graphs API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Healthz API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Platform API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Processes API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Profiles API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Readyz API
OPEN COLLECTIONMIDAS Agents Surfaces API
OPEN COLLECTIONScroll within the panel for all 23 ·
Event Specifications 1
Not every API is request/response. AsyncAPI describes the event-driven and streaming side — the webhooks and channels — so the asynchronous half of the interface is documented the same way the synchronous half is.
AsyncAPI definitions for this provider's event-driven and streaming APIs.
MIDAS External Event Contract
External event contract for MIDAS decision governance. Events are written to a transactional outbox in the same Postgres transaction as domain state changes, then dispatched to ...
ASYNCAPISecurity Posture 3
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Accept — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 4
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 3
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 5
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 6
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Build 5
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 4
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 6
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 1
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
Other 1
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/accept · machine-readable index on apis.io
This is an independent, third-party profile of Accept, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.
The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.
Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.
info@apievangelist.com
·
Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and
you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.