Need help with your APIs? I offer API discovery, governance & evangelism services. Explore services →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC
Agno website screenshot

Agno

Agno (formerly Phidata) is a high-performance open-source Python framework for building multi-modal, multi-agent systems with memory, knowledge, tools, and reasoning capabilities. It provides both an agent development SDK and AgentOS, a production runtime that transforms agents into managed APIs with 50+ endpoints for runs, sessions, memory, knowledge, traces, evaluations, and scheduling. AgentOS supports RBAC, per-user session isolation, streaming via Server-Sent Events, background execution, and human-in-the-loop approval flows. The platform supports 30+ LLM providers and can be deployed on AWS, GCP, Railway, or air-gapped environments with data remaining in the customer's cloud.

agent ready

Real signal across most facets with visible, nameable gaps — the contract exists but is thin, or the portal is good while governance and commercial terms are absent.

Kin Score

API Evangelist profiles Agno the way a machine reads it — 42 machine-readable artifacts across 21 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.

Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Agno scores 57.5/100 (developing), with a separate agent-readiness read of 55/100 (agent ready). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.

Kin Score

This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.

Kin Score Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
Composite quality — 57.5/100 · developing
Contract Quality 15.9 / 25
Developer Ergonomics 4.3 / 20
Commercial Clarity 10.0 / 20
Operational Transparency 6.8 / 13
Governance 10.4 / 12
Discoverability 10.0 / 10
Agent readiness — 55/100 · agent ready
Machine-Readable Contract 18 / 18
Agentic Access Contract 15 / 15
MCP Server 0 / 12
Machine-Readable Auth 10 / 10
Idempotency 0 / 9
Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8
Request/Response Examples 7 / 7
Rate-Limit Signaling 7 / 7
Typed Event Surface 0 / 6
Agent Skills 0 / 5
Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4
Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

How we profile Agno

Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Agno. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.

APIs 21

Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

Agno A2A API

The A2A API from Agno — 15 operation(s) for a2a.

Agno Agents API

The Agents API from Agno — 6 operation(s) for agents.

Agno AGUI API

The AGUI API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for agui.

Agno Approvals API

The Approvals API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for approvals.

Agno Components API

The Components API from Agno — 6 operation(s) for components.

Agno Core API

The Core API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for core.

Agno Database API

The Database API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for database.

Agno Evals API

The Evals API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for evals.

Agno Health API

The Health API from Agno — 1 operation(s) for health.

Agno Home API

The Home API from Agno — 1 operation(s) for home.

Agno Knowledge API

The Knowledge API from Agno — 8 operation(s) for knowledge.

Agno Memory API

The Memory API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for memory.

Agno Metrics API

The Metrics API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for metrics.

Agno Registry API

The Registry API from Agno — 1 operation(s) for registry.

Agno Schedules API

The Schedules API from Agno — 7 operation(s) for schedules.

Agno Sessions API

The Sessions API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for sessions.

Agno Slack API

The Slack API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for slack.

Agno Teams API

The Teams API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for teams.

Agno Traces API

The Traces API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for traces.

Agno Whatsapp API

The Whatsapp API from Agno — 2 operation(s) for whatsapp.

Agno Workflows API

The Workflows API from Agno — 5 operation(s) for workflows.

Scroll within the panel for all 21 ·

Pricing Plans 1

Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the six things the Kin Score reads for commercial clarity.

Published pricing tiers and plan structures.

Agno Plans Pricing

3 plans

PLANS

Rate Limits 1

Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.

Documented rate limits and quota policies.

Agno Rate Limits

3 limits

RATE LIMITS

FinOps 1

Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.

Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.

Agno Finops

FINOPS

Semantic Vocabularies 1

JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.

JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.

Agno Context

14 classes · 37 properties

JSON-LD

Spectral Rules 1

Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.

Agno API Rules

5 rules · 4 warnings

SPECTRAL

JSON Schema 12

Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.

Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.

AgentResponse

22 properties

JSON SCHEMA

AgentSessionDetailSchema

14 properties

JSON SCHEMA

ApprovalResponse

25 properties

JSON SCHEMA

ComponentResponse

8 properties

JSON SCHEMA

HealthResponse

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

KnowledgeDomainConfig

1 properties

JSON SCHEMA

MetricsResponse

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

RunSchema

25 properties

JSON SCHEMA

ScheduleResponse

15 properties

JSON SCHEMA

SessionSchema

5 properties

JSON SCHEMA

TraceDetail

19 properties

JSON SCHEMA

UserMemorySchema

7 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Scroll within the panel for all 12 ·

Examples 1

Real request and response payloads are what turn a spec from abstract into obvious — and they're one of the twelve things an agent needs to call an API correctly on the first try.

Example request and response payloads for these APIs.

Agno Agentos Api Examples

4 fields

EXAMPLE

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Agno Authentication

http · 1 scheme

SECURITY

Agno Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Agno Agentic Access

117 operations · 61 acting · 1 human-in-the-loop

117 operations · 61 acting

AGENTIC

Resources

Every other property we hold for Agno — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.

Documentation 1

Reference material describing how the API behaves

Agent Surfaces 1

MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs

Design & Contract 2

Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events

Build 2

SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with

Access & Security 2

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

Operate 2

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Commercial 3

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

Company 3

The organization behind the API

Other 1

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/agno · machine-readable index on apis.io