API Pulse
API Pulse is a comprehensive survey and benchmarking platform created by API Evangelist that helps organizations understand their API maturity and standing within their business sector. It collects detailed data about how companies develop, deploy, and manage APIs across technology stack, authentication, standards adoption, CI/CD integration, and organizational structure.
Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.
API Evangelist profiles API Pulse the way a machine reads it — 19 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — API Pulse scores 34.4/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 39/100 (agent aware). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile API Pulse
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for API Pulse. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 1
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
API Pulse Signals API
The overall signal.
Open Collections 1
Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.
Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).
API Pulse Publishing
OPEN COLLECTIONGraphQL 1
Where a provider ships GraphQL, the schema is the contract. We profile it alongside the REST surface so the whole interface is legible in one place.
GraphQL schemas published by this provider.
API Pulse GraphQL API
GRAPHQLPricing Plans 1
Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the six things the Kin Score reads for commercial clarity.
Published pricing tiers and plan structures.
Rate Limits 1
Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.
Documented rate limits and quota policies.
Api Pulse Rate Limits
RATE LIMITSFinOps 1
Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.
Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.
Api Pulse Finops
FINOPSFeatures 7
The notable capabilities this provider advertises, captured as structured features so they can be searched and compared instead of read one landing page at a time.
Notable capabilities this provider offers.
People and Organization Profiling
Gathers details about team roles, organizational structure, and geographic location to contextualize API maturity.
API Inventory Assessment
Documents counts of internal, partner, and public APIs to establish portfolio breadth.
Technology Stack Mapping
Tracks usage of HTTP APIs, GraphQL, event-driven architectures, and RPC protocols across the organization.
Authentication Methods Tracking
Records implementation of BasicAuth, API keys, JWT, and OAuth across API products.
Standards Adoption Measurement
Measures use of OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, JSON Schema, and other API specifications.
CI/CD Integration Assessment
Identifies governance tools like Spectral, Vacuum, and Redocly integrated into development pipelines.
Experience Prioritization Evaluation
Evaluates organizational priorities for documentation, SDKs, testing, and consistency.
Scroll within the panel for all 7 ·
Security Posture 1
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Use Cases 4
What developers actually build with this provider — captured so the catalogue answers 'what is this for', not just 'what does this expose'.
What developers build with this provider.
API Maturity Benchmarking
Organizations benchmark their API practices against industry peers by submitting standardized signal data.
Governance Gap Analysis
Identify gaps in API governance, documentation, and tooling adoption compared to best practices.
API Modernization Planning
Use survey data to plan API modernization initiatives based on current maturity levels.
Industry Sector Comparison
Compare API practices within specific business sectors using NAICS industry classification.
Resources
Every other property we hold for API Pulse — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Agent Surfaces 1
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Build 1
SDKs, sample code, and the tooling you integrate with
Access & Security 1
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Company 1
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/api-pulse · machine-readable index on apis.io