How AI is applied across API Evangelist and APIs.io. Read my AI disclosure →
API Evangelist API Evangelist
Discovery
Learnings
Guidance
Toolbox
Alignment
API Evangelist LLC
APIs.io website screenshot

APIs.io

APIs.io is an open-source API search engine and federated discovery network built on the APIs.json specification. It indexes API providers and their individual APIs across the public internet along with the machine-readable artifacts they publish — OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, Arazzo workflows, Postman collections, JSON Schema, JSON-LD contexts, Spectral rulesets, vocabularies, OAuth scopes, plans, rate limits and FinOps profiles — and lets developers and agents search that catalog by keyword, capability, tag, industry, region, artifact type and quality band. As of August 2026 the network published roughly 26,414 providers, 109,100 APIs and 120,595 schemas across 71 industries and 77 curated areas. Every provider is scored with the Kin Score, a 0–100 composite across six weighted facets plus a standalone agent-readiness score. The same read-only OpenAPI 3.1 contract powers three surfaces — a REST API at https://apis.io/api/v1, a Streamable-HTTP MCP server at https://apis.io/mcp, and a set of published Agent Skills — alongside an RFC 9727 api-catalog linkset, an llms.txt and an APIs.json self-description. It is maintained by API Evangelist and serves both API producers submitting profiles and API consumers discovering APIs.

agent native

Reference-quality API operations across every facet — a rich contract, published governance, transparent operations, and machine-readable commercial terms.

Kin Score

API Evangelist profiles APIs.io the way a machine reads it — 112 machine-readable artifacts across 19 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.

Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — APIs.io scores 71.9/100 (exemplar), with a separate agent-readiness read of 55/100 (agent native). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.

Kin Score

This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance. Every facet and dimension name is a link: it opens that measurement's page on APIs.io, where the rating runs across the whole catalog — the exact checks that feed it, how every profiled provider distributes on it, and who is at the top of it.

Kin Score Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-09-10 · rubric v0.20.0
Composite quality — 71.9/100 · exemplar
Contract Quality 17.6 / 25
Access Clarity 16.8 / 20
Discoverability 9.3 / 10
APIs.io Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist

Put this on your own site. The badge is drawn live from APIs.io's current Kin Score — paste it once and it updates itself every time the score is recomputed. It follows your visitor's light or dark setting, and it links back here so anyone who sees it can read the full breakdown.

<!-- Kin Score · API Evangelist -->
<a href="https://providers.apievangelist.com/providers/apis-io/"
   title="APIs.io on API Evangelist — API profile and Kin Score">
  <img src="https://apis.io/badge/apis-io.svg"
       alt="APIs.io Kin Score — API readiness rating by API Evangelist" width="150" height="150" loading="lazy">
</a>

More shapes, themes and sizes → · Score as JSON · How badges work

How we profile APIs.io

Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for APIs.io. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.

APIs 18

Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.

Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.

APIs.io Submit API

Discover a domain's machine-readable API surface and submit a provider for review — the Add-API door, documented first-party from the serving Lambda.

APIs.io APIs API

Index of HTTP application programming interfaces.

APIs.io Areas API

The API Evangelist areas taxonomy — curated topic collections (authentication, webhooks, payments, …), each a scored provider index with its own site. Pro.

APIs.io Artifact Types API

First-class, per-type artifact collections (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, Arazzo, Postman, JSON Schema, and more). Each path filters and normalizes one artifact type across all providers.

APIs.io Industries API

Industry verticals grouping providers across the catalog.

APIs.io Insights API

Demand-side intelligence — what ~5,800 companies (Fortune 1000 + API providers) build, buy, and hire for around APIs, data, and AI, derived from job postings, press, and enginee...

APIs.io Providers API

Organizations publishing APIs on the network.

APIs.io Ratings API

The APIs.io API rating system — a 0–100 composite score, five bands, a trend marker, and six weighted facets measuring how complete, governed, and integration-ready each provide...

APIs.io Regions API

Geographic regions grouping providers across the catalog.

APIs.io Search API

Search using a cloud search engine.

APIs.io Synthesis API

Decision-grade composites over the catalog — provider comparison, gap analysis, catalog change feed, and recommended-stack design. Pro.

APIs.io Tags API

The tag taxonomy, with network-wide ranking metadata.

APIs.io Cohorts API

Any scored population of providers — a tag, industry, region, area, or VC portfolio — with the distribution, rankings, facet scores, and capability matrix that a Trend or Portfo...

APIs.io Editorial API

Story leads mined from catalog movement (owner tier). 1 operation of the APIs.io API, split out by tag so this surface is documented, rated, and governed on its own.

APIs.io Export API

Bulk dataset pulls of the catalog — ratings and providers as one download (Business tier). 2 operations of the APIs.io API, split out by tag so this surface is documented, rated...

APIs.io Resolve & Enrich API

Agent ergonomics — resolve any identifier (domain, URL, GitHub org) to a provider, and enrich a provider in one call by choosing field groups. 2 operations of the APIs.io API, s...

APIs.io Saved Workspace API

Saved searches and provider lists for a signed-in apis.io API key — save a query, re-run it, and watch what is net-new. 10 operations of the APIs.io API, split out by tag so thi...

APIs.io Venture Capital API

Venture-capital firms as a first-class entity — fund identity plus a network-matched, rated portfolio graph, and the reverse edge from a provider to the VCs that back it. 4 oper...

Scroll within the panel for all 18 ·

Postman Collections 11

A runnable collection turns the contract into something a developer can execute in seconds. We profile them because the fastest way to trust an API is to make a real call against it.

Ready-to-run Postman collections for exercising this provider's APIs.

Scroll within the panel for all 11 ·

Open Collections 12

Open, tool-agnostic collections carry the same runnable value as Postman without locking you to one client — the portable, forkable form of the same exercise.

Open, tool-agnostic API collections (OpenAPI-derived and Bruno).

Scroll within the panel for all 12 ·

Arazzo Workflows 4

Real integrations are rarely a single call. Arazzo describes the multi-step sequences — auth, then create, then confirm — so both a human and an agent can follow the choreography, not just the endpoints.

Multi-step API workflows described with the Arazzo specification.

APIs.io Compare Keyword Coverage

Run two keyword searches against APIs.io and compare how many APIs the index holds for each term.

ARAZZO

APIs.io Paginate Search Results

Read the first page of a keyword search, learn the total page count, then fetch a following page of results.

ARAZZO

APIs.io Search APIs by Keyword

Search the APIs.io registry for APIs matching a keyword and branch on whether any results were returned.

ARAZZO

APIs.io Submit and Verify API

Submit a valid APIs.json to the APIs.io index, then search the registry to confirm the submitted API appears.

ARAZZO

MCP Servers 1

Model Context Protocol servers expose these APIs directly to AI agents. We profile them because agent-native access is the fastest-growing way this provider's capabilities actually get used.

Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.

APIs.io MCP Server

MCP SERVER

Pricing Plans 1

Pricing is part of the interface. Machine-readable plans tell you what a tier costs and includes before you commit — one of the things the Kin Score reads for access clarity — renamed from commercial clarity in rubric 0.12, because a free statutory interface has access terms and no commercial ones.

Published pricing tiers and plan structures.

Apis Io Plans Pricing

4 plans

PLANS

Rate Limits 1

Rate limits are the difference between a demo that works and a production integration that doesn't fall over. Publishing them is an operational-transparency signal — and a hard requirement for any agent that plans its own throughput.

Documented rate limits and quota policies.

Apis Io Rate Limits

8 limits

RATE LIMITS

FinOps 1

Cost, billing, and metering signals let a buyer model the financial operations of an API before it's live. We profile them for the same reason we profile pricing: the money is part of the contract.

Cost, billing, and metering signals for API financial operations.

Features 7

The notable capabilities this provider advertises, captured as structured features so they can be searched and compared instead of read one landing page at a time.

Notable capabilities this provider offers.

API Search

Full-text search across 3,000+ indexed APIs by keyword, resource, action, persona, domain, and schema using a cloud search engine.

APIs.json Indexing

Automatically indexes APIs.json files submitted by API producers to build a comprehensive, machine-readable catalog of API operations.

API Submission

API producers can submit their APIs to the index by providing a valid APIs.json document via the Search API POST endpoint or GitHub issues.

Spectral API Ratings

Spectral-powered quality rating system that evaluates API documentation completeness and scores APIs to help consumers identify high-quality APIs.

Microservice Architecture

Built as a set of microservices including Search, Engine, Authentication, Publishing, Tags, Rules, Properties, Maintainers, and Ratings APIs.

Topic Search Nodes

Specialized search nodes for domain-specific API discovery including AI, Healthcare, Banking, Payments, Weather, CRM, Cloud, and many more topic areas.

Open Source

The platform is open source, licensed under Apache-2.0, with all microservice APIs available on GitHub under the api-search organization.

Scroll within the panel for all 7 ·

Semantic Vocabularies 1

JSON-LD contexts give the data shared meaning across APIs. We profile them because semantics are what let a machine reconcile 'customer' here with 'customer' somewhere else.

JSON-LD contexts and semantic vocabularies used across these APIs.

Apis Io Context

15 classes · 34 properties

JSON-LD

Spectral Rules 2

Governance rulesets we run against this provider's specs — the automated checks behind parts of the score. Profiling them makes the quality bar explicit and re-runnable, not a matter of opinion.

APIs.io API Rules

5 rules · 3 warnings

SPECTRAL

APIs.io API Rules

71 rules · 48 errors · 23 warnings

SPECTRAL

JSON Schema 13

Standalone JSON Schema definitions describe the data models behind the API. We profile them so the shapes are validatable on their own — useful long after a single request is forgotten.

Standalone JSON Schema definitions for this provider's data models.

AddAPIsJSON

1 properties

JSON SCHEMA

APIsJSON

11 properties

JSON SCHEMA

APIs

0 properties

JSON SCHEMA

API

9 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Contact

9 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Include

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Link

5 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Maintainer

1 properties

JSON SCHEMA

metaInformation

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Meta

5 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Property

2 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Search

3 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Tag

0 properties

JSON SCHEMA

Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·

JSON Structure 13

JSON Structure captures the data shapes in a form built for tooling — a complement to JSON Schema that keeps the model machine-legible.

JSON Structure definitions describing this provider's data shapes.

Apis Io Search Add Ap Is Json Structure

1 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Ap Is Json Structure

11 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Ap Is Structure

0 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Api Structure

9 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Contact Structure

9 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Include Structure

2 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Link Structure

5 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Maintainer Structure

1 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Meta Information Structure

2 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Meta Structure

5 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Property Structure

2 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Search Structure

3 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Apis Io Search Tag Structure

0 properties

JSON STRUCTURE

Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·

Examples 13

Real request and response payloads are what turn a spec from abstract into obvious — and they're one of the twelve things an agent needs to call an API correctly on the first try.

Example request and response payloads for these APIs.

Scroll within the panel for all 13 ·

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Apis Io Authentication

apiKey · 2 schemes

SECURITY

Apis Io Domain Security

TLSv1.3

SECURITY

Agentic Access 1

An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.

Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.

Apis Io Agentic Access

64 operations · 1 acting

64 operations · 1 acting

AGENTIC

Use Cases 5

What developers actually build with this provider — captured so the catalogue answers 'what is this for', not just 'what does this expose'.

What developers build with this provider.

API Discovery

Developers can search for APIs relevant to their project by keyword, discovering APIs across thousands of providers without knowing where to look.

API Submission

API producers can submit their APIs.json files to ensure their APIs are discoverable in the index and properly cataloged with metadata.

Quality Assessment

Development teams use the Spectral ratings system to identify high-quality APIs and avoid poorly documented or unmaintained options.

Catalog Building

Platform teams use APIs.io as a reference implementation for building their own internal API catalogs using the APIs.json format.

Domain-Specific Search

Developers searching for APIs in specific domains (healthcare, finance, AI) can use topic-specific search nodes for more targeted discovery.

Integrations 6

Pre-built integrations with other platforms tell you where this provider already fits in a stack.

Pre-built integrations with other platforms and tools.

APIs.json

Core integration with the APIs.json specification for machine-readable API description and discovery across the web.

OpenAPI

APIs indexed in APIs.io reference OpenAPI specifications as a key property, linking consumers to technical API contracts.

Spectral

Spectral ruleset integration powers the APIs.io rating system, evaluating API documentation quality against standardized rules.

GitHub

GitHub integration for API submission via issues, source of truth for indexed APIs.json files, and authentication via Personal Access Tokens.

Postman

Postman public workspace integration for running and testing the APIs.io Search API via pre-built collections.

AWS API Gateway

The APIs.io Search API is deployed and managed through AWS API Gateway for scalable, managed API access.

Resources

Every other property we hold for APIs.io — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.

Documentation 2

Reference material describing how the API behaves

Other 1

Properties that don't map to a standard resource type

← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/apis-io · machine-readable index on apis.io

Where this information came from

This is an independent, third-party profile of APIs.io, published by API Evangelist. We do not operate, host, resell, or support these APIs, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by the company unless stated above. Everything here is built from publicly available information — the company's own site, developer portal, documentation, public repositories, and the specifications it publishes for public use. Nothing is obtained by breaching a system, defeating an access control, or using credentials.

The Kin Score and Agent Readiness rating are independently calculated assessments of a company's public API artifacts, scored against a published rubric. They are not certifications, endorsements, security assessments, or audits.

Corrections, re-scores, and removal are free — no partnership or purchase required, and you do not need to justify the request. A removed company is recorded as unrated, never scored zero for having asked. Acknowledgement within one business day; removal within two.

info@apievangelist.com · Read the full data-sourcing policy →
On a security or compliance team? Put security in the subject line and you will get a person, not a form — we will tell you exactly which public URLs this profile was built from.