Mindlogic
Mindlogic is a South Korean generative-AI company whose products include FactChat (a multi-LLM enterprise chat platform with Studio chatbot building, deep research, meeting notes, and image/video generation), Bliss (a persona chatbot that learns a person's voice and personality for fan engagement), and Informe (a multilingual document-grounded website chatbot). For developers, Mindlogic operates the FactChat API Gateway — a unified, OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible LLM proxy that fronts models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, xAI and Perplexity behind a single API key, metered in credits, with chat completions, an OpenAI Responses pass-through, an Anthropic Messages pass-through, text-to-speech, and image/video generation.
Limited machine-readable signal and partial portal coverage — documentation a human can read, but little a machine or agent can consume without scraping.
API Evangelist profiles Mindlogic the way a machine reads it — 11 machine-readable artifacts across 7 APIs, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Mindlogic scores 39.4/100 (thin), with a separate agent-readiness read of 65/100 (agent native). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
Kin Score
How this is scored →scored 2026-07-27 · rubric v0.5
How we profile Mindlogic
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Mindlogic. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 7
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Mindlogic Audio API
The Audio API from Mindlogic — 1 operation(s) for audio.
Mindlogic Chat API
The Chat API from Mindlogic — 1 operation(s) for chat.
Mindlogic Credits API
The Credits API from Mindlogic — 1 operation(s) for credits.
Mindlogic gateway API
The gateway API from Mindlogic — 7 operation(s) for gateway.
Mindlogic Images API
The Images API from Mindlogic — 2 operation(s) for images.
Mindlogic Models API
The Models API from Mindlogic — 2 operation(s) for models.
Mindlogic Video API
The Video API from Mindlogic — 3 operation(s) for video.
Scroll within the panel for all 7 ·
MCP Servers 1
Model Context Protocol servers expose these APIs directly to AI agents. We profile them because agent-native access is the fastest-growing way this provider's capabilities actually get used.
Model Context Protocol servers that expose these APIs to AI agents.
mindlogic-mcp.yml
MCP SERVERSecurity Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Agentic Access 1
An x-agentic-access contract marks which operations are safe for an agent to run on its own and which need a human in the loop. It is the difference between an API an agent can use and one it can use safely.
Recommended x-agentic-access execution contracts for AI agents.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Mindlogic — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Get Started 2
Portal, sign-up, and the first successful call
Documentation 2
Reference material describing how the API behaves
Agent Surfaces 4
MCP servers, agent skills, and machine-readable catalogs
Design & Contract 5
Pagination, idempotency, versioning, errors, and events
Access & Security 2
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Operate 1
Status, limits, changes, and where to get help
Commercial 2
Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use
Company 2
The organization behind the API
Other 1
Properties that don't map to a standard resource type
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/mindlogic · machine-readable index on apis.io