Peloton
A connected fitness company offering stationary bikes, treadmills, rowers, and a digital platform for live and on-demand fitness classes. Peloton pioneered the premium at-home fitness category, blending hardware, software, and instructor-led content into an interactive workout experience available across Peloton equipment and a standalone Peloton App on iOS, Android, web, and connected TV. Peloton does not publish a public developer API, partner portal, or third-party integration program; all API surfaces are internal and only reachable through the consumer apps. Reverse-engineered community libraries exist on GitHub but are unsupported by Peloton.
Index entry only — little beyond a description and a link, and nothing machine-readable enough for an agent to act on without a human reading the site first.
API Evangelist profiles Peloton the way a machine reads it — 4 machine-readable artifacts across 1 API, pulled from the provider's own public surface and indexed so a developer, an analyst, or an AI agent can evaluate it against every other provider on the network.
Every provider in the network is reduced to the same set of machine-readable artifacts — OpenAPI contracts, event specifications, GraphQL schemas, runnable collections, pricing and rate-limit signals, security posture, OAuth scopes, and the agent surfaces (MCP servers and skills) that let software drive the API on its own. We profile them because the interface is the part of a company you can actually inspect: it is a truer signal of what a provider does than any marketing page. From those artifacts we compute the Kin Score — Peloton scores 9.3/100 (minimal), with a separate agent-readiness read of 0/100 (human only). The full breakdown is below, followed by every artifact we hold — each card links through to its machine-readable definition on apis.io.
Kin Score
This is the API Evangelist rating — a single, repeatable read computed from the artifacts on this page. Green fill is points earned; the red track is points possible, so every bar shows earned-versus-possible at a glance.
How we profile Peloton
Each block below is one kind of artifact we hold for Peloton. For each we say what it is and why it earns a place in the profile, then list every one we've indexed — capped at two rows, scroll within the panel for the rest.
APIs 1
Each API is captured as its own OpenAPI definition — every operation, parameter, and response. This is the single most useful machine-readable description of what an API does, and it's what lets us score, lint, mock, and generate against it without asking the provider for anything.
Individual APIs this provider publishes, each with its own machine-readable definition.
Peloton API
Conceptual GraphQL schema for the Peloton connected fitness platform, derived from community reverse-engineering of the internal REST API. Covers authentication, users, subscrip...
GraphQL 1
Where a provider ships GraphQL, the schema is the contract. We profile it alongside the REST surface so the whole interface is legible in one place.
GraphQL schemas published by this provider.
Peloton GraphQL Schema
This is a conceptual GraphQL schema for the Peloton connected fitness platform. Peloton does not publish a public developer API or official GraphQL endpoint. This schema is deri...
GRAPHQLSecurity Posture 2
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals — the evidence that a provider takes security seriously enough to document it. We profile it because you can't govern what you can't see.
Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.
Resources
Every other property we hold for Peloton — documentation, portals, status pages, policies, and corporate surface — grouped by the job it does, following the integrator's arc from getting started to running in production.
Access & Security 2
Authentication, authorization, and security posture
Company 2
The organization behind the API
← All providers · Data indexed from github.com/api-evangelist/peloton · machine-readable index on apis.io